Return to Home Page Return to Home Page
Sponsored by -
WZZM on Facebook WZZM on Twitter Watch ABC News Online Watch ABC Shows Online

Bush vetoes stem cell bill

  • Updated:6/20/2007 2:02:01 PM - Posted: 6/20/2007 1:51:49 PM
  • Comments

  • Print
  • Larger
  • Smaller
Advertisement

WASHINGTON - For a second time, President Bush on Wednesday vetoed a bill that would have eased federally funded embryonic stem cell research.

It was only the third veto of the Bush presidency.

At the same time, Bush was issuing an executive order directing the Department of Health and Human Services to promote research into cells that, like human embryonic stem cells, also hold the potential of regenerating into different types of cells that might be used to battle disease.

Stem cell research, which pits ethics against science, is a delicate political issue.

Opponents of the latest bill insisted that the use of embryonic stem cells was the wrong approach on moral grounds - and possibly not even the most promising one scientifically. These opponents cite breakthroughs involving medical research conducted with adult stem cells, umbilical cord blood and amniotic fluid, none of which involve the destruction of a human embryo.

Bush, in his executive order, was making federal funding available for research on additional "pluripotent" stem cells - ones that can give rise to any kind of cell in the body except those required to develop a fetus.

The National Institutes of Health says these stem cells offer the prospect of having a renewable source of replacement cells and tissues to treat Parkinson's and Alzheimer's diseases, spinal cord injury, stroke, burns, heart disease, diabetes, osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis and other conditions.

"This is, certainly not an attempt to muzzle science," White House press secretary Tony Snow said. "It is an attempt, I think, to respect people's conscience on such an issue."

Democrats had made passage of the stem cell research bill a high priority when they took over Congress in January, but do not have enough votes to override a veto.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., in calling for Bush to sign the bill, said it acknowledges the ethical issues at stake and offers even stronger research guidelines than exist under the president's current policy.

"This is just one example of how the President puts ideology before science, politics before the needs of our families, just one more example of how out of touch with reality he and his party have become," Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., told the Take Back America conference of liberal activists Wednesday.

Scientists were first able to conduct research with embryonic stem cells in 1998, the NIH says. There were no federal funds for the work until Bush announced on Aug. 9, 2001, that his administration would make the funds available for lines of cells that already were in existence.

Currently, states and private organizations are permitted to fund embryonic stem cell research, but federal support is limited to cells that existed as of Aug. 9, 2001. The latest bill is aimed at lifting that restriction.

In his first veto, Bush rejected legislation passed by Republican-led Congress to allow funding of additional lines of embryonic stem cells. Bush's second veto of his presidency rejected legislation that would have set timetables for U.S. troop withdrawals from Iraq.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi used Bush's veto threat as a reason to send out an e-mail letter soliciting contributions to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee to help elect more Democrats.

"By vetoing a bill that expands stem cell research, the President will say 'no' to the more than 70% of Americans who support it, 'no' to our Democratic Congress' fight for progress, and 'no' to saving lives and to potential cures for diseases such as diabetes and Parkinson's," Pelosi wrote. "He will say 'no' to hope."

Contributing: The Associated Press

By David Jackson, USA TODAY


In your voice

  • Online discussion standards: What we'll allow and what we won't allow
  • Read reactions to this story